💭

Hypothetical situations are what-if scenarios that describe possible events.

Hypothetically, if there were only one person in the world capable of creating innovations and cures for prosperity and diseases, and an aggressive nation believed that conquering the world—being a supposed superpower—meant destroying other nations' prosperity and peace, this nation might think that chaos, subterfuge, sabotage, and harm are the ways to achieve this grand goal.

This aggressor nation might believe that by bringing down people and nations, it will rise higher and conquer more.

Targeting and destroying this creator of innovation would drastically reduce prosperity and increase deaths from disease, boosting this aggressor’s chances of achieving superpower status, even if that status is exaggerated.

Let's say this devious, grandiose plan works—no more innovations, no more cures for diseases.

How does destroying prosperity and peace actually prevent a stagnant, unproductive economy, especially as spending on war and aggression skyrockets?

If the entire world experiences a decline in creativity, innovation, and cures, how can this aggressor sustain its economy, let alone its conquests and supposed superpower status, amidst all those expenses and liabilities?

What would happen—only God knows—but sooner or later, when resources are depleted and nothing is being created, every intelligent person would know.

And what would happen to the economies of the attacked nations and their planned conquests when nothing productive is being made?  In this case, anyone with a brain could see what’s coming.

Nothing will be achieved while resources and people are depleted and destroyed in this grand push for superpower status, world domination, and conquest. And anyone following this grandiose and harmful scheme for superpower status and world conquest will cause their own destruction faster, as all their dominoes fall.

🕊